“I need to scale up to run 200 more jobs/day starting next month.”
The Top BMC Control-M Alternative: JAMS Job Scheduler
JAMS vs. Control-M
Based on G2 customer review data from Enterprise companies in the Workload Automation category, Winter 2026.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Admin | 89% | 82% |
| Ease of Set Up | 87% | 78% |
| Has this product been a good business partner? | 94% | 89% |
| Would you recommend this product to a friend or colleague? | 92% | 87% |
| Avg. Go Live Time? | 3 Months Avg. | 4 Months Avg. |
| Is this product heading in the right direction? | 94% | 85% |
| Quality of Support | 98% | 88% |
| API / Integrations | 89% | 81% |
| Intelligent Automation | 97% | 89% |
| Scalability | 93% | 92% |
Join the JAMS customers that have switched from Control-M
See how Seminole Electric went from Friday morning troubleshooting to maximum productivity by switching to JAMS as a BMC Control-M replacement.
Do you feel like you’re being taken advantage of? You CAN have a world class WLA solution for less overall cost.
IT teams shouldn’t need to spend valuable time weighing the benefits of workload automation and the licensing required to implement it. When demand increases, choosing JAMS as a Control-M alternative provides multiple options to meet demand quickly, and at a reasonable cost.
How well will your WLA vendor respond to your next automation initiative?
“We need to train new team members to use, edit, and monitor our growing library of jobs.”
“We need to add high availability to our entire automation infrastructure.”
See What Makes JAMS a Control-M Alternative

Real users. Real results. See why JAMS is rated a top Workload Automation leader on G2, TrustRadius, and PeerSpot — and why IT pros at leading companies are making the switch.